约瑟夫·康拉德《吉姆爷》中的叙事判断  

Narrative Judgments in Joseph Conrad’s Lord Jim

作　　者：陈祎满 CHEN Yi-man(School of Literature,Northwestern University,Xi’an,Shanxi 710127)

机构地区：[1]西北大学文学院,陕西西安710127

出　　处：《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2023年第4期67-73,95,96,共9页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：约瑟夫·康拉德的小说《吉姆爷》围绕“帕特纳号沉船事件”和“布朗事件”展开,主人公对事件的阐释判断和叙述者们对事件多元的伦理判断,与读者对“确定性”的本能追求形成了充满张力与活力的辩证关系。康拉德通过多种叙述声音使读者审美预期受阻的同时也使其更积极地与文本进行双向对话,在推动小说叙事进程的同时,丰富了小说的艺术形式,实现小说在叙事形式、叙事伦理和审美意蕴上的交融和暗合。同时,从人物的阐释判断、叙述者的伦理判断以及读者的审美判断三方面对《吉姆爷》的叙事判断进行论述,也为詹姆斯·费伦的叙事判断理论提供了一种更清晰的阐释路径。Joseph Conrad's novel Lord Jim develops around“the wreck of the Patna”and“the Brown incident”.The interpretive judgment of the protagonist and the narrators’different ethical judgment form a dialectical relationship full of tension and vitality with the readers’instinctive pursuit of“certainty”.Conrad obstructs readers’aesthetic expectation through a variety of narrative voices,and at the same time makes them more active in the two-way dialogue with the text.While promoting the narrative process of the novel,Conrad enriches its art form,and merges narrative form,narrative ethics and aesthetic implications.At the same time,the discussion of its narrative judgment in terms of the characters’interpretative judgment,the narrator’s ethical judgment and the reader’s aesthetic judgment provides a clearer interpretative method for James Phelan’s narrative judgment theory.

关 键 词：约瑟夫·康拉德 《吉姆爷》 阐释判断 伦理判断 审美判断 

分 类 号：I106.4[文学—世界文学]