国内外大型游乐设施安全距离要求比对研究  

International Comparative Study of Safety Distance for Large-scale Amusement Devices

作　　者：王华杰 吕梦南 孙艺峰[1,2] 崔明亮 Wang Huajie;Lv Mengnan;Sun Yifeng;Cui Mingiang(Key Laboratory of Special Equipment Safety and Energy-saving for State Market Regulation,Beijing,100029;China Special Equipment Inspection&Research Institute,Beijing,100029)

机构地区：[1]国家市场监管重点实验室(特种设备安全与节能),北京100029 [2]中国特种设备检测研究院,北京100029

出　　处：《中国特种设备安全》2023年第10期1-8,共8页China Special Equipment Safety

基　　金：中国特种设备检测研究院内部科研项目(2021青年19)。

摘　　要：游乐设施安全距离是保障乘客安全的重要因素,我国标准虽简单易行,但合理性上亟须完善。本文对中国标准、美国标准和欧盟标准对于安全距离要求的内容从技术层面进行剖析,从标准要求、设计流程、内容优缺点3个方面进行了全面的技术分析比对。并分别通过3个标准对2个实例进行了安全包络线分析以进行直观的对比,分析了各自的优缺点。我国标准更直观易行;依据美国标准得到的包络线更吻合实验员触及范围;欧盟标准则提供了更多的处理方式。本文最后给出了后续标准制定的方向。The safety distance of passengers on amusement devices is an important factor in ensuring the safety.Although the Chinese standard is simple and easy to implement,its rationality urgently needs improvement.This paper analyzes the technical aspects of the requirements for safety distance in Chinese,American,and European standards,and conducts a comprehensive technical analysis and comparison from three aspects:standard requirements,design process,and content advantages and disadvantages.The safety enveloping analysis of two examples was conducted through the three standards for intuitive comparison,and their respective advantages and disadvantages were analyzed.The Chinese standard is more easy to implement;the envelop obtained according to the American standard is more approached with the range touched by the experimenters;and the European standard provides more processing methods.Finally,this paper provides the direction for future standard formulation.

关 键 词：游乐设施 标准 安全距离 安全包络线 

分 类 号：X924[环境科学与工程—安全科学]