检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李恒[1] 赵金强 王新慧[1] 丁彦龙 吴占稳[1] Li Heng;Zhao Jinqiang;Wang Xinhui;Ding Yanong;Wu Zhanwen(China Special Equipment Inspection&Research Institute,Beijing,100029)
出 处:《中国特种设备安全》2023年第10期55-60,共6页China Special Equipment Safety
摘 要:为有效指导使用单位正确选择新装电梯的品牌,通过层次分析法(AHP法)的理念建立评价体系,含4个一级指标及20个二级指标;用AHP法和熵权法(EWM法)求得综合权重,最后采用贴近理想解排序法(TOPSIS法)分析贴近度,确定方案优劣性。结果表明:该方法能够避免主客观因素的影响及单一方法的决策失误,选择有效的评价指标,使得结果更贴近实际。可见该方法不仅对电梯品牌的选择,而且对电梯的安全监管也有一定的指导意义。In order to effectively guide the users to correctly select the brand of newly installed elevators,an evaluation system is established based on the concept of analytic hierarchy process(AHP),including 4 first-class indicators and 20 second-class indicators;AHP method and entropy weight method(EWM method)are used to obtain the comprehensive weight.Finally,TOPSIS method is used to analyze the closeness and determine the advantages and disadvantages of the scheme.The results show that this method can avoid the influence of subjective and objective factors and the decision-making mistakes of a single method,select effective evaluation indicators,and make the results closer to reality.It can be seen that this method has certain guiding significance not only for the choice of elevator brands,but also for the safety supervision of elevators.
关 键 词:电梯品牌评价 层次分析法 熵权法 贴近理想解排序法 综合权重
分 类 号:X941[环境科学与工程—安全科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.35