个人信息保护中“告知—同意”原则的困境与出路  

The Dilemma of the“Notice-consent”Principle for the Protection of Personal Information and Its Solutions

作　　者：康霖 贾爱玲[1] KANG Lin;JIA Ailing(Law School,Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University,Hangzhou 311300,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江农林大学文法学院,杭州311300

出　　处：《江苏工程职业技术学院学报》2023年第3期105-112,共8页Journal of Jiangsu College of Engineering and Technology

摘　　要：个人信息被称为“站在大数据顶峰的宝石”,“告知—同意”原则是保护个人信息权的黄金原则,却在实际适用中面临困境:“敏感信息”与“一般信息”难以界定,信息保护和信息利用之间的动态平衡空间难以建立。这就导致“告知”的结构性缺陷和“同意”的认知性缺陷。在现行法律框架中,根据“告知—同意”原则的价值基础,采取两分法将信息处理行为分为涉人格尊严的行为和无涉人格尊严的行为,以此作为“告知”与“同意”不同适用程度要求的标准,在解释论的立场为破解“告知—同意”原则的适用困境寻求出路。Personal information is known as the“the jewel at the peak of big data”.“Notice-consent”principle,which is the golden rule of protecting personal information,faces a dilemma when applied in practice.The structural defects of“notice”and the cognitive defects of“consent”are attributed to the difficulty in defining“sensitive information”and“common information”,and in building dynamic balance between the protection and the use of information.According to the value base of such principle,this paper adopted dichotomy under the system of the law in force to distinguish information-processing behaviors by determining whether they have affected one’s dignity or not,which serves as a criterion for the application of such principle at different levels,as well as a way out of the dilemma from the perspective of science of Interpretation.

关 键 词：个人信息保护 “告知—同意”原则 信息处理行为 两分法 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]