中国民事庭审中话语主导权研究  

Discursive Authority in China's Civil Trials

作　　者：方硕瑜 王振华[1] FANG Shuoyu;WANG Zhenhua

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学外国语学院,上海200240

出　　处：《外语与外语教学》2023年第4期15-28,146,共15页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基　　金：上海交通大学文科创新团队培育计划项目“从庭审到判决书”(项目编号:WKCX007)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：诉讼当事人与法官之间话语主导权的配置对审判活动的有序运行和司法公正产生重要影响。本文借鉴系统功能语言学语旨维度的立场定位系统,结合庭审语域特征,提出了一个适用于研究中国民事庭审中话语磋商的框架,从立场的提出与应对两方面考察中国民事庭审中诉讼主体话语主导权的分布。研究发现:(1)法官在“知识/行动”回合的发起、态度的维持上具有高话语权力,体现其在程序性和实质性诉讼指挥上的话语主导权;(2)当事人自主表达态度的权力通过法官给予或共享话语权限来实现,体现其在程序保障和辩论原则上的话语主导权。研究表明,法官能够控制或促进诉讼当事人话语主导权的发挥。The distribution of discursive authority between litigants and judges has important implications for orderly trial processes and impartial justice.Drawing on the tenor positioning system from Systemic Functional Linguistics and considering the specific trial register,this paper proposes a theoretical framework for analysing discursive negotiation in China's civil trials,which examines the distribution of authority at a trial through tendering and rendering positions.The findings are:(1)judges hold discursive authority in commanding both procedural and substantive litigation,as represented by their power to initiate knowledge/action exchanges and maintain attitudes;(2)litigants'discursive authority is ensured by procedural safeguards and the right to debate which allow them to express themselves when the judge shares or gives them purviews.The findings indicate that judges can control or promote the discursive authority of litigants in the trial.

关 键 词：民事庭审 话语主导权 话语磋商 立场定位 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]