检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭军 TAN Jun(Guizhou Water Resources and Hydropower Survey,Design and Research Institute,Guiyang 550002,China)
机构地区:[1]贵州省水利水电勘测设计研究院,贵州贵阳550002
出 处:《河南水利与南水北调》2023年第8期87-88,共2页Henan Water Resources & South-to-North Water Diversion
摘 要:新建堤型比选是河道防洪治理工程建设的重要内容,对其功能的有效发挥具有重要的工程意义。为此,结合射水河新建防洪治理工程堤型比选实践案例展开分析研究。认识射水河防洪治理工程概况,针对现状基本问题,联系工程实际,通过新建堤防轴线与结构布置完成堤防工程总体布置;并着重就堤防类型的三种可选方案:重力挡墙式、小趾墙式和贴坡挡墙式综合分析比较,确定小趾墙式堤防为最优方案,其基础要求低、投资更节省的特性可为类似工程提供借鉴参考。The comparison and selection of new embankment type is an important content in the construction of river flood control project,which has an important engineering significance for the effective play of its function.Therefore,the dike type comparison and selection practice of the new flood control project of Sheshui River are analyzed and studied in this paper.The general situation of Sheshui River flood control project is understood.According to the basic problems of the present situation and the engineering practice,the overall layout of the dike project is completed through the axis and structure layout of new dike.The alternative schemes of gravity retaining wall,small toe wall and sloping retaining wall are analyzed and compared.The small toe wall embankment is determined to be the best scheme.Its characteristics of low foundation requirement and lower investment can provide reference for similar projects.
分 类 号:TV871[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7