护理管理者自我效能量表的汉化及信效度检验  

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses

作　　者：贺涛涛 陈阳 宋彩妮 李超群 刘佳 黄静 Taotao He;Yang Chen;Caini Song;Chaoqun Li;Jia Liu;Jing Huang(School of Nursing,Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,Hunan,China;Endoscopy Room,The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University,Hunan,China;Department of Nursing,Hunan Normal University,Hunan,China;Department of Osteopathic,Hunan Provincial Hospital of Integrative Medicine,Hunan,China;Department of Nursing,Hunan Cancer Hospital,Hunan,China;Department of Scientific Research,Hunan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hunan,China)

机构地区：[1]School of Nursing,Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,Hunan,China [2]Endoscopy Room,The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University,Hunan,China [3]Department of Nursing,Hunan Normal University,Hunan,China [4]Department of Osteopathic,Hunan Provincial Hospital of Integrative Medicine,Hunan,China [5]Department of Nursing,Hunan Cancer Hospital,Hunan,China [6]Department of Scientific Research,Hunan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hunan,China

出　　处：《International Journal of Nursing Sciences》2023年第4期503-510,共8页国际护理科学（英文）

基　　金：supported by Hunan University of Chinese Medicine-Joint Training Base for Top Innovative Talents for Graduate Students in Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Nursing.

摘　　要：目的旨在翻译护理管理者自我效能量表(Self-Efficacy Perception Scale of Administrator Nurses,SEPSAN),并对其进行信度和效度的检验。方法对英文版SEPSAN进行翻译,并通过横断面研究验证其信效度。采用Brislin翻译模型,包括直译、回译、整合、文化调适5个步骤,将英文版量表翻译为中文版。于2023年4—5月采用目的抽样法,选取中国5个城市20所综合性医院的382名护理管理者进行问卷调查。采用内容效度、结构效度和聚合效度评估量表的效度;采用Cronbach's α系数、重测信度评估量表的信度。结果中文版SEPSAN各条目内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.86~1.00,平均内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)为0.98。探索性因子分析提取5个公因子,为计划、组织、指挥、协调、质量控制,共包括41个条目,累计方差贡献率为63.72%;验证性因子分析显示各项拟合指数表现较好。中文版量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.95,重测信度为0.87(P<0.05)。结论中文版SEPSAN具有良好的信效度,可作为评估我国护理管理者自我效能的评价工具。Objectives:This study aimed to translate the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale of Administrator Nurses(SEPSAN)into Chinese and test its reliability and validity among nurse managers.Methods:A scale translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted.The English version was translated for Chinese by the Brislin translation model included direct translation,back translation,integration,and cultural adjustment.A total of 382 nurse administrators were recruited from 20 general hospitals in five Chinese cities to assess the reliability and validity of the scale from April to May 2023.Validity assessments included content,structural,and convergent validity.Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s a coefficient and testeretest reliability.Results:The item-content validity index(I-CVI)of the scale ranged from 0.86 to 1.00,and the average scale-level content validity index(S-CVI/Ave)for the overall scale was 0.98.The exploratory factor analysis indicated five dimensions(planning,organizing,commanding,coordinating,controlling,and inspecting)with 41 items.The cumulative variance contribution rate was 63.72%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit.The general Cronbach’s a coefficient was 0.95,and the testeretest reliability was 0.87.Conclusion:The Chinese version of SEPSAN showed satisfactory reliability and validity and thus can be used to assess the self-efficacy of nurse administrators in China.

关 键 词：护理管理者 信度 自我效能 调查及问卷 信度 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]