检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪政 WANG Zheng
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学法学院
出 处:《法治研究》2023年第6期149-160,共12页Research on Rule of Law
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目资助(项目编号:22YJC820054);中国政法大学科研创新项目资助(项目编号:21ZFQ82005)研究成果。
摘 要:21世纪,法律科技已经进入司法领域,并成为利益相关者之间竞争的基本生产要素。本文实证考察法律科技对法律服务市场和法律服务模式的影响,揭示法律科技作为生产要素与法律服务深度融合,已经从效率提升的应用辅助演变为创新发展和高质量发展的数字驱动力。通过比较研究的方法重点关注法律科技对法律服务行业的影响,以及对律师事务所的冲击和变革。研究发现:一是法律科技冲击传统的法律服务行业;二是法律科技推动律师事务所管理和服务模式的创新变革;三是法律科技将重构法律服务市场。上述发现有助于厘清法律科技与法律服务市场融合发展的关系,并在此基础上为完善法律职业伦理基本理论提供新的思路和经验依据。In the 21st century,legal technology has entered the judicial field and become a basic factor of production for competition among stakeholders.This paper empirically examines the impact of legal technology on the legal services market and legal services model,revealing that legal technology,as a factor of production deeply integrated with legal services,has evolved from an application aid for efficiency enhancement to a digital driver for innovative development and high-quality development.This paper focuses on the impact of legal technology on the legal services industry through a comparative research approach to the impact and transformation of law firms.The findings are:first,legal technology impacts the traditional legal services industry;second,legal technology drives innovative changes in law firm management and service models;and third,legal technology will restructure the legal services market.The above findings help clarify the relationship between legal technology and the integration and development of the legal service market,and provide new ideas and empirical basis for improving the basic theory of legal professional ethics on this basis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.210.110