检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋欢 吴瑞林[1] SONG Huan;WU Ruilin(School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Beihang University,Beijing 100191;High Technology Research and Development Center,Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China,Beijing 100044)
机构地区:[1]北京航空航天大学人文社会科学学院,北京100191 [2]科学技术部高技术研究发展中心,北京100044
出 处:《全球科技经济瞭望》2023年第8期19-26,76,共9页Global Science,Technology and Economy Outlook
摘 要:科技计划项目的同行评议是实现科技资源优化分配的重要手段,为项目遴选合适的评审专家是项目管理专业机构面临的一项重要任务。以专家遴选相关的国家政策作为指引,结合中国专业机构项目管理的现状和需求,围绕评审专家学术专长匹配、评审行为规范以及回避制度问题,提出完善项目评审专家遴选机制的建议:加强学术界与专业机构对于评审专家遴选机制的沟通与交流,对专家匹配方法进行风险评估和优化升级,逐步建立和完善评审专家信用评价体系,建立更加科学合理的专家回避制度。以期为推动中国国家科技计划项目管理的改革与发展提供重要参考。Peer review of science and technology projects is an important way to achieve optimal allocation of science and technology resources.Therefore,it is an important task for project management professional agencies to select appropriate reviewers for the project.This paper takes the relevant government policies toward reviewer selection as a guide,and analyzes the status and needs of project management by professional agencies in China.Following these,it focuses on the key issues,including the reviewer matching,reviewer behaviors and reviewer avoidance systems.As a result,it proposes to improve the reviewer selection mechanism by strengthening communication between academia and project management professional agencies,carrying out risk assessment and upgradation of matching method,gradually establishing and improving a credit evaluation system for reviewer,and establishing a more scientific and reasonable system of expert avoidance.The above may provide an insight for the reform and development of national science and technology project management in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.126.168