检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁文彩 LIANG Wen-cai
机构地区:[1]甘肃政法大学
出 处:《江苏警官学院学报》2023年第5期12-19,共8页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute
摘 要:自1997年我国刑法颁布以来,其中适用没收财产的罪名数量没有明显增加,整体上符合罪刑对应的基本要求。但从某些规定来看,没收财产的立法配置仍带有一定的随意性。近些年来,没收财产的司法适用情况表明没收部分财产的整体适用率较低,且无论是外在形式还是处罚功能均趋同于罚金。因此,立法上可以先废除没收部分财产,以罚金实现对没收部分财产的替代;与此同时,积极调整刑法分则具体罪名中没收财产的适用方式。在此基础上,我国可从司法、立法两个层面逐步实现对没收全部财产的适用限制。Since the promulgation of the Criminal Law in 1997,the number of crimes applicable to penalty of property confiscation has not increased significantly,which meets the basic requirements of corresponding crimes and punishments on the whole.However,some provisions also reflect that the legislative disposition of penalty of property confiscation is still somewhat arbitrary.The judicial application of penalty of property confiscation in recent years shows that the overall application rate of confiscation of some property is low,and it is similar to fine in both external form and penalty function.Therefore,legislation can abolish the confiscation of part of property and replace it with a fine.Meanwhile,the application of penalty of property confiscation in the specific charges of the Criminal Law also needs to be adjusted accordingly.On this basis,we should gradually realize the restriction of the confiscation of all property from the aspects of judicature and legislation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.113.227