机构地区:[1]全国水产技术推广总站中国水产学会,北京100125 [2]中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所,山东青岛266071 [3]崂山实验室,山东青岛266237
出 处:《渔业科学进展》2023年第6期214-224,共11页Progress in Fishery Sciences
基 金:国家重点研发计划(2020YFD0900103);山东省自然科学基金博士基金(ZR2019BC026);国家自然科学基金青年基金(32102854);青岛海洋科学与技术试点国家实验室科研启动项目(JCZX202029)共同资助。
摘 要:固定床生物膜反应器(fixed-bed biofilm bioreactor,FBBR)和移动床生物膜反应器(movingbed biofilm reactor,MBBR)在养殖水体氨氮(NH_(4)^(+)-N)和亚硝酸氮(NO_(2)^(–)-N)污染控制中已有较为广泛的研究,然而相关研究大多是在实验室完成的,目前尚缺乏实际生产的循环水养殖系统(recirculating aquaculture system,RAS)中FBBR和MBBR水体净化效能的对比研究。因此,本研究将FBBR(弹性毛刷滤料)和MBBR(PVC多孔环滤料)并联接入实际生产的墨瑞鳕(Macculochella peeli)RAS中,实现二者的同步连续运行(35 d),考察了其出水水质变化和微生物群落结构。出水水质变化表明,FBBR和MBBR中氨氧化能力的形成快于亚硝氮氧化能力,硝化能力渐趋成熟,可以有效控制养殖水体中的NH_(4)^(+)-N和NO_(2)^(–)-N浓度,但会导致养殖水体中硝酸氮(NO_(3)^(–)-N)积累和p H下降;单因素方差分析表明,FBBR出水中NH_(4)^(+)-N、NO_(2)^(–)-N、NO_(3)^(–)-N浓度和p H与MBBR出水无显著差异,两反应器的硝化效率相似。FBBR和MBBR在微生物群落上的相同点在于:优势菌门为变形菌门(Proteobacteria)(相对丰度分别为69.42%和86.92%),优势菌纲为γ-变形菌纲(γ-Proteobacteria)(40.71%和63.36%)和α-变形菌纲(α-Proteobacteria)(26.58%和21.74%),优势菌属为不动杆菌属(Acinetobacter)(27.50%和53.29%);硝化菌由亚硝化单胞菌属(Nitrosomonas)和硝化螺菌属(Nitrospira)构成;硝化螺菌属的相对丰度远高于亚硝化单胞菌属,两反应器中可能存在完全氨氧化菌。两反应器在微生物群落上的不同点在于FBBR微生物群落的丰富度和多样性以及硝化菌的相对丰度均高于MBBR。本研究可以为RAS养殖水体净化提供技术支撑,助推循环水养殖模式的推广应用。With the development of the aquaculture industry for high efficiency,energy saving,and environmentally friendly methods,recirculating aquaculture has attracted increasing attention from researchers and practitioners.A recirculating aquaculture system(RAS) consists primarily of an aquaculture module and a water purification module.In the aquaculture module,nitrogen in the feed could be released into the water phase through various routes(i.e.,the feedstuff residue and aquaculture animal excretion),whose species can be transformed by microbes.Free ammonia and nitrite have acute toxic effects on aquaculture animals,rendering the efficient removal of ammonia and nitrite essential for the RAS.Compared with physical and chemical methods,biological treatment methods based on microbial nitrification can convert ammonia and nitrite into less toxic nitrate with the advantages of good treatment performance,low operation cost,and little secondary contamination,and have been widely utilized in the purification of multiple wastewaters(e.g.,municipal wastewater,industrial wastewater,agricultural wastewater,and ammonia-contaminated groundwater).For the treatment of recirculating water with low and fluctuating nitrogen loads,a biofilm process based on the attached growth of microbes is more suitable than an activated sludge process based on the suspended growth of microbes.To date,a variety of biofilm processes have been developed,among which the fixed-bed biofilm reactor(FBBR) and moving-bed biofilm reactor(MBBR) have been widely investigated for the control of ammonia and nitrite in aquaculture wastewater.However,the relevant studies were mostly conducted in laboratory-and pilot-scale RASs.Thus,there is still a lack of comparative investigations of FBBR and MBBR,which are simultaneously operated in a full-scale RAS.Therefore,a parallel FBBR and MBBR were joined to a full-scale RAS for Macculochella peeli.The FBBR and MBBR were simultaneously and continuously operated for 35 d to investigate variations in their water quality and
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...