检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高笑笑 Gao Xiaoxiao(School of Literature and Law,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China)
出 处:《科技创业月刊》2023年第10期30-34,共5页Journal of Entrepreneurship in Science & Technology
摘 要:人工智能在经济、社会和法律领域被广泛应用。继AI绘画之后,ChatGPT再度掀起了人工智能及其生成作品能否获得著作权保护的讨论热潮。从著作权法上主客体的构成要件入手,结合ChatGPT,先分析人工智能目前不具有法律拟制的主体资格,无法独立拥有、行使人身财产权利并承担侵权后果,再阐释人工智能生成作品也不满足“独创性”和“外在表达”的法律要求,最后论证得出人工智能本身及其生成作品尚不能成为著作权法调整的对象,但理应获得其他相应法律的规制与保护。在关注人工智能给著作权制度带来法律挑战的同时,还要认识到其给著作权理论发展、作品价值评估、审查与保护手段升级提供的新机遇。Artificial intelligence is widely used in economic,social and legal fields.Following AI painting,ChatGPT once again raised the issue of whether artificial intelligence and its generated works can be protected by copyright.Based on the constitutive elements of subject and object in copyright law,combined with ChatGPT,it is firstly analyzed that the current artificial intelligence does not have the qualification of legal fiction subject,cannot independently own,exercise personal and property rights and bear the consequences of infringement,and the artificial intelligence generated works do not meet the legal requirements of“originality”and“external expression”,and finally concluded that artificial intelligence itself and its generated works cannot be the object of copyright law adjustment,but they should be regulated and protected by other relevant laws.While paying attention to the legal challenges brought by artificial intelligence to the copyright system,we should also clearly understand the new opportunities provided by the development of copyright theory,work value assessment,censorship and protection means upgrading.
关 键 词:人工智能 著作权制度 法律挑战与机遇 ChatGPT生成作品
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33