阿城的出国与归来——兼及九十年代的“失踪者”  

Acheng's Journey Abroad and Subsequent Return

作　　者：朱明伟 ZHU Ming-wei(College of Liberal Arts,Communication University of Zhejiang,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310018)

机构地区：[1]浙江传媒学院文学院,浙江省传播与文化产业研究中心,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《江南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2023年第5期108-116,共9页Journal of Jiangnan University：Humanities & Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：阿城的出国与归来是一个二十世纪八九十年代转折中的作家故事,但其问题信息要在新时期文学“后三十年”的较长时段中才能充分释放。本文以阿城的出国、归来为例,兼及二十世纪九十年代的“失踪者”话题,试图探索影响作家姿态的生活史难题。“阿城们”因无稳定的资助来源而出国,又为寻求自我资助而归来,始终未能获得稳定的生存方式。可见“一体化”的文学组织方式对于“后三十年”的作家身份与生存方式,仍有着漫长的影响。重访二十世纪九十年代文学的这类“失踪者”,不仅是文学现象研究,也牵涉二十世纪九十年代文学重评等文学史议题。Acheng's journey abroad and subsequent return constitute a writer's narrative during the transitional period of the 1980s and 1990s.However,its issue-related information can only be fully elucidated within the broader context of"the last thirty years"of literature in the new era.This article employs Acheng's journey abroad and return as an exemplar while also delving into the theme of'the missing'during the 1990s.It examines how life histories impact the writer's perspective.Due to the lack of stable funding sources,many writers,like Acheng,went abroad and returned in search of self-funding but struggled to secure a consistent means of subsistence.This underscores the enduring influence of the'integrated'literary organizational model on writers'identities and survival strategies during the'last thirty years.'Revisiting the"missing persons"in 1990s literature not only entails an exploration of literary phenomena,but also encompasses a crucial aspect of literary historiography,such as the reassessment of 1990s literature.

关 键 词：阿城 出国 二十世纪九十年代文学 作家资助 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]