检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱钟锐 马辉[1] Zhu Zhongrui;Ma Hui(Capital Medical University School of Medical Humanities,Beijing 100069,China)
出 处:《中国卫生法制》2023年第6期71-76,共6页China Health Law
摘 要:手术机器人作为智能医疗机器人的一种,以其智能性和一定的独立性有别于一般医疗器械,给目前的侵权责任带来了主体地位不清、产品侵权责任受到忽视等问题。对此,根据手术机器人的发展现状和应用状况,目前应仍以客体定位手术机器人,但随着技术的发展和独立性的突出,应及时关注并可以赋予其法律拟制的有限人格。同时可以将设计者纳入手术机器人侵权责任主体,借鉴国外经验确定产品设计缺陷的认定依据,以应对手术机器人智能化不断增强所带来的挑战。As a kind of intelligent medical robot,surgical robot is different from general medical devices due to its intelligence and certain independence,which brings about problems such as unclear subject status and neglect of product tort liability.In this regard,according to the development status and application status of surgical robots,the surgical robots should still be oriented by objects at present.However,with the development of technology and the prominence of independence,attention should be paid in a timely manner and they can be endowed with a limited personality created by law.At the same time,designers can be included in the main body of tort liability of surgical robots,and foreign experience can be used for reference to determine the basis for identifying product design defects,so as to cope with the challenges brought by the increasing intelligence of surgical robots.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33