清律“财产犯罪”体系的比较法阐释  

A Comp ativeResearck ystem in The Qing Code

作　　者：谢晶[1] XIE Jing

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院,北京102249

出　　处：《学术月刊》2023年第10期99-108,共10页Academic Monthly

基　　金：中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队支持计划“中国传统法律文化的创造性转化”(21CXTD10);国家社会科学基金重点项目“清代经营西北边疆成败得失研究”(20AFX006);北京市社科基金重点项目“清代法制之腹边文化互动研究”(20FXA004)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在比较法的视野下,古今中西均有诸多与“财产犯罪”相关的罪名。在我国传统时代亦然,以《大清律例》为代表的传统律典中并无现代意义的“财产犯罪”概念以及专门章节,但其通过“以”“准”字例以及《六赃图》形成纵、横两个方向的“暗线”,勾连起事实上的“财产犯罪”体系,并通过这样的立法技术实现了各罪罚则和价值取向的平衡与协调。西方历史上的各财产犯罪,在现代刑法法益观念的影响之下,被“简化为平行侵犯单一利益”的一类犯罪,从而发生了模糊各罪界限、财产犯罪“去体系”的现象,并影响及于我国现行《刑法》。《刑法》最新的司法解释又试图区分各罪,但区别之时未充分顾及各罪之间的平衡与协调,在规则逻辑与价值取向两个层次均出现混乱。In the perspective of comparative law,there are many charges related to property crime in both ancient and modern China and the West.This was also true in traditional China,where the traditional legal code,represented by The Qing Code,did not contain the concept of property crime in the modern sense,nor did it contain specific chapters.However,through the Yi and Zhun statutes,as well as the Six Booty Crimes Map,it forms a vertical and horizontal line,linking up the de facto property crime system.And through such legislative techniques a balance and harmonization of the penalties and values of the various crimes is achieved.Under the influence of the modern concept of legal interest in criminal law,the various property crimes in Western history have been simplified into a parallel category offence against a single interest,resulting in the phenomenon of blurring the boundaries of various crimes and de-systematization of property crimes,which has affected China's current Criminal Law.However,the latest judicial interpretation of the Criminal Law attempts to distinguish between the various crimes,but the distinction is made without sufficient consideration of the balance and coordination between the various crimes,and confusion arises at both the logic of the rules and the level of value orientation.

关 键 词：大清律例 财产犯罪 盗律 六赃 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]