18世纪至20世纪西方古迹调查记录图像与文化中“科学性与主观性”研究  

"Scientificity and Subjectivity"in the Image and Culture of Western.Monuments Survey Records from the 18th Century to the 20th Century

作　　者：唐湉 陈蔚 戴月 Tang Tian;Chen Wei;Dai Yue

机构地区：[1]不详

出　　处：《华中建筑》2023年第11期15-20,共6页Huazhong Architecture

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(面上项目)“道教圣境空间原型提取与‘洞天福地’景观建筑形态结构性演化机制研究”(编号:52278004)。

摘　　要：1996年《历史纪念物、建筑群和遗址记录准则》等纲领性文件的颁布使古迹调查的相关活动纳入科学体系化的轨道。19世纪兴起的遗产保护学科建立了从修复实际出发的古迹调查记录任务与目标要求,建筑遗产调查记录的科学性与视觉性也带来了“碎片化”建筑遗产价值的倾向。科学技术逻辑潜在推动记录体系化和标准化,时代背景和文化身份则带来记录中的价值倾向和主观性。如何平衡两者以最大限度保证对遗产价值的理解与尊重,视觉文化史视角的介入无疑有所助益。关注“时间—影像自身的力量”,科学性记录与主观性观看平衡性或会带来遗产保护观念迭进发展的新可能。The promulgation of landmark documents such as the Guidelines for the"Recording of Historic Monuments,Groups of Buildings and Sites"in 1996 brought activities related to monument surveys into a scientific and systematic track.The discipline of heritage conserva-tion that emerged in the 19th century established the task and goal requirements of monument survey records based on actual restoration.The scientific and visual nature of architectural heritage survey records also brought about a tendency towards the"fragmentation"of the value of architectural heritage.The potential of scientific and technological logic has driven the systematization and standardization of recording,while the era and cultural identity have brought about value tendencies and subjectivity in recording.The intervention of a visual cultural history perspective can undoubtedly help balance the two to maximize the understanding and respect for heritage value,and explore new possibilities for the interplay between scientific recording and subjective observation or heritage conservation concepts,with a focus on the"time-image's own power".

关 键 词：古迹调查 测绘 建筑遗产 科学性 主观性 

分 类 号：TU-88[艺术—艺术设计]