论我国董事义务的融合性建构路径  

On the Integrative Construction Path of Directors’Obligations in China

作　　者：成朋 孙学亮[1] CHENG Peng;SUN Xue-liang(School of Law,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300000,China)

机构地区：[1]天津商业大学法学院,天津300000

出　　处：《陕西行政学院学报》2023年第4期62-66,共5页Journal of Shaanxi Academy of Governance

摘　　要：英美法董事义务来源于信托义务,通过判例干预的方式加以完善;大陆法董事义务根植于民商法理论,更重视对不特定主体的财产保护。二者在具体作用以及保护法益上区别显著,我国当前立法上同时且重复地体现了两大法系内容,需要进一步深耕法系差异并且区分发挥彼此优势。The directors’obligations in Anglo American law originate from trust obligations and are improved through case intervention;the obligation of directors under mainland law is rooted in the theory of civil and commercial law,and places greater emphasis on the protection of property for unspecified subjects.There are significant differences between the two in terms of their specific functions and the benefits of the protection law.China’s current legislation simultaneously and repeatedly reflects the content of the two legal systems,so it is necessary to further explore the differences between legal systems and leverage each other’s advantages in differentiation.

关 键 词：信义义务 信托概念 董事责任 公司治理 

分 类 号：D922[政治法律—法学]