检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈秭锟 CHEN Zikun(Institute of International Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430061,China)
出 处:《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第6期106-117,共12页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学重大研究专项“坚持统筹推进国内法治与涉外法治研究”(2022JZDZ005)。
摘 要:无人船时代的到来,意味着海上货物运输法的适用面临新的挑战。借助转承责任理论,将受雇型远程控制人视为船舶所有人,其地位和责任与国际海上货物运输公约及《海商法》第四章下承运人的受雇人无异。承运人作为雇主,应承担转承责任。视独立型远程控制人为独立合同人,在《海商法》修改时将独立合同人纳入承运人的责任体系中,使独立型远程控制人能享受到承运人的抗辩与责任限制的权利。自主航行船舶中因AI航行系统缺陷导致的产品责任应归属于其生产者或销售者,而不属于承运人。自主航行船舶的法律人格化并非一个不切实际的幻想,转承责任将为这一进程提供理论支持。The advent of the era of unmanned ships means that the application of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Law will face new challenges.With the help of the theory of vicarious liability,the employed remote controller is regarded as the personnel of the shipowner,and its status and responsibilities are the same as the servant under the international conventions on the carriage of goods by sea and Chapter IV of China Maritime Code.The carrier shall bear the vicarious liability as an employer.The independent remote controller is regarded as an independent contractor,and the independent contractor should be included in the carrier's liability system in the revision of China Maritime Code,so that the independent remote controller can enjoy the carrier's defense and limitation.The product liability caused by defects of AI navigation system in the autonomous unmanned ship should be assumed by its producer or seller,but not by the carrier.The legal personification of autonomous unmanned ships is not an unrealistic fantasy,and the theory of vicarious liability will provide theoretical support for this process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145