国际社会中科学与政策互动的类型学研究  

A Typological Analysis of the Science-Policy Interface in International Society

作　　者：安德万 AN De-wan(Academy of Global Governance and Area Studies,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu 610066,China)

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学全球治理与区域国别研究院,成都610066

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2023年第9期78-83,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家民委“一带一路”国别和区域研究中心四川师范大学东南亚研究中心2022年度项目“区域海洋环境治理的东盟路径”(2022DNYYB001)。

摘　　要：国际组织是国际公共政策辩论和决策的一个重要平台。一方面,国际组织内的政策辩论和政策知识生产离不开科学基础;另一方面,不同行为体之间的政治博弈会影响科学的角色扮演。因此,不同国际组织就如何生产政策知识做出了不同的组织安排,在决策中如何使用生产出的政策知识也存在很大差异。使用类型学分析方法,基于成员国的视角,可把国际组织中科学与政策的互动分为四个类型,即供应、共同生产、操控、选择性引用/漠视/辩驳,并选取了三个政府间国际组织(ICES、IPBES、世界银行),具体考察了它们如何组织生产政策知识,这些知识如何被成员国使用,以对科学与跨国政策决策的复杂互动关系进行全景式观察。International organizations are important platforms for international public policy debates and decision-making.On the one hand,the policy debates and policy knowledge in international organizations need scientific base;on the other hand,the political game between different actors will affect the role playing of science.Therefore,different international organizations have different organizational arrangements on how to produce scientific policy knowledge,and how to use the produced policy knowledge in their decision-making is also very different.Using the typological analysis,based on the perspective of member countries,the science-policy interface in international organizations can be divided into four types,namely,supply type,co-production type,manipulation type,selective quotation/indifference/refutation type,and three intergovernmental international organizations(the ICES,the IPBES,and the World Bank)are selected to specifically examine how they organize the production of policy knowledge and how these knowledge is used by their member countries,in order to make a panoramic observation of the complex interaction between science and transnational policy decision-making.

关 键 词：科学与政治的互动 类型学 国际组织 ICES IPBES 世界银行 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学] D815[政治法律—国际关系]