深度合成技术背景下刑法数据治理模式的转换  

The transformation of criminal law data governance mode under the background of deep synthesis technology

作　　者：刘刚[1] 刘钊 LIU Gang;LIU Zhao(Law School,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China)

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《佛山科学技术学院学报（社会科学版）》2023年第6期40-50,共11页Journal of Foshan University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(22JZD002)。

摘　　要：我国刑法中关于数据治理侧重于保护数据主体对数据的控制力,只规定了出售或收集数据的行为类型,非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪存在入罪行为类型过少的问题。现行刑法数据治理模式无法应对深度合成技术引发的数据依赖、数据伪造、数据偏见等风险。为了更好地应对深度合成技术带来的风险,保护数据法益,应当将数据控制安全保护模式转变为数据利用安全保护模式,以整合数据资源为重,兼顾维护数据主体的权利,将治理重心放在“规制数据利用行为”。实现治理模式的转换具体可以从以下几方面入手:明确数据法益的内涵;防止对“知情同意”规则的不当使用;在刑法分则条文中增加篡改、编造、储存、滥用数据和恶意植入数据偏见等行为类型。Data governance in China’s criminal law focuses on protecting the data subject’s control over the data,only stipulating the types of selling or collecting.The crime of illegally obtaining computer system data has the problem that the scope of the crime is too narrow.The current criminal law data governance model cannot cope with the risks of data dependence,data falsification and data bias presented by deep synthesis technology.In order to better cope with the risks brought by deep synthesis technology and protect data legal interests,the data governance model should be shifted from data control security protection mode to data utilization security protection mode,with a focus on integrating data resources and maintaining the rights of the subject,with a focus on“regulating data utilization behavior”.The transformation of governance models can be achieved from the following aspects:clarifying the connotation of data legal interests;preventing improper use of the‘informed consent’rule;increasing types of behavior such as tampering,fabricating,storing,abusing data,and maliciously implanting data biases.

关 键 词：深度合成技术 数据治理模式 数据法益 数据资源开发 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]