检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于泽瑞 Yu Zerui(Xizang Minzu University,Xianyang shaanxi 712082)
机构地区:[1]西藏民族大学,陕西咸阳712082
出 处:《安徽体育科技》2023年第5期69-72,共4页Journal of Anhui Sports Science
摘 要:目的:结合新版FIG健美操竞赛规则对17届健美操世锦赛混双决赛成套难度动作进行对比分析,了解世界优秀运动员的难度编排,为我国混双项目提供编排支撑和创新思想,为我国运动员和教练员提供难度选择与训练建议,提高我国竞技健美操混双项目国际竞争力。方法:文献资料法、录像分析法、数理统计法。结果:1.各国优秀运动员难度动作选择起点较高。2.难度动作组合单一,缺乏创新。3.难度动作选择分布不均匀,空中难度选择使用率较高。Objectives:To combine the new version of the FIG aerobics competition rules with the 17 aerobics world championships mixed pairs final sets of difficult movements for comparative analysis,to understand the difficulty of the world's best athletes choreography,to provide choreographic support and innovative ideas for China's mixed pairs program,to provide difficulty selection and training advice for our athletes and coaches,and to improve the international competitiveness of China's competitive aerobics mixed pairs program.Methods:Literature method,video analysis method,mathematical and statistical method.Results:1.The starting point of difficulty selection for the best athletes from different countries is high.2.The combination of difficulty is single and lacks innovation.3.The distribution of difficulty selection is uneven,and the usage rate of aerial difficulty selection is high.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198