检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王敬文 WANG Jingwen
机构地区:[1]东南大学法学院
出 处:《法学评论》2023年第6期39-47,共9页Law Review
基 金:江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目“我国行政解释制度重构研究”(项目编号:KYCX23-0207)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:行政解释普遍存在于行政执法活动之中,行政执法过程必然涉及法律的适用性解释。从实践逻辑上讲,行政执法过程就是法律的解释过程,无解释即无行政。但相对于司法解释、立法解释而言,行政解释的规范化、制度化程度存在严重不足,导致其功能暗弱无彰。基于推进行政执法体制改革、提升行政执法质效之需要,发挥行政执法在法律实施中的主渠道作用,有必要正视行政解释的内在价值和实践功能,并参仿司法解释制度,重塑行政解释机制和程序,形成解释权相对集中的行政解释制度。Administrative interpretation generally exists in administrative law enforcement activities,and the process of administrative law enforcement inevitably involves the interpretation of the applicability of the law.In this sense,the process of administrative law enforcement is the process of legal interpretation,and without interpretation,there is no administration.However,compared to judicial and legislative interpretations,there are serious deficiencies in the standardization and institutionalization of administrative interpretations,resulting in its weak function.In order to promote the reform of administrative law enforcement system and improve the quality and effect of administrative law enforcement,and to play the main channel role of administrative law enforcement in legal implementation,it is necessary to face up to the internal value and practical function of administrative interpretation.Based on the experience of judicial interpretation system,the administrative interpretation mechanism and procedure should be reshaped to form a relatively centralized administrative interpretation system.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171