基于功能主义的合同制度统合  

Integration of Contract System Based on Functionalism

作　　者：张平华[1] Zhang Pinghua

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东青岛266237

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2023年第6期149-161,共13页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目(19AFX012)“民法典背景下损害赔偿规范体系的整合与完善研究”。

摘　　要：同一合同事实时常对应着多个规范或制度,逻辑主义坚持区分不同规范或制度择一适用,而功能主义则趋向于改变固有逻辑进行制度统合。作为最明显的合同法律制度创新,制度统合既包括宏观上的制度统一,也表现为微观上的规范统合。近年来流行以违约和侵权为代表的债因规范统一、违约形态统一,但是却不能完全取代类型区分。规范统合分为事实构成的联合、法律效果的聚合或融合等。事实构成的联合包括平面领域中行为的联合以及立体层次中效力影响因素的联合;法律效果的聚合或融合包括“主导—辅助”式效果聚合、“手段—结果”式效果聚合以及在既定规范基础上嫁接借用其他制度的效果融合。The same contractual fact frequently corresponds to multiple norms or systems,which logicalism insists on distinguishing between different norms or systems and selecting one for application,while functionalism tends to change the inherent logic to integrate systems.As the most conspicuous innovation in the legal system of contracts,the system integration includes both macro-level system unification and micro-level norm integration.The unification of the norms of debt causes,represented by breach of contract and tort,and the unification of the forms of breach of contract have prevailed in recent years,but they cannot completely replace the distinction of types.The types of normative integration are divided into the combination of factual components and the aggregation or fusion of legal effects.The combination of factual constitution includes the combination of acts on the flat field and the combination of factors influencing effectiveness on the tridimensional level;the aggregation or fusion of legal effects includes the aggregation of effects in a“dominant-ancillary”way,the aggregation of effects in a“means-result”way and the fusion of effects in a way that other systems are grafted on to the established norms.

关 键 词：功能主义 合同制度统合 制度统一 规范统合 事实联合 效果聚合或融合 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]