何为西藏实际:从清末革新藏政及其相关研究展开的讨论  

The Reality of Tibet:A Discussion from the Perspective of the Reform of Tibetan Politics in the Late Qing Dynasty

作　　者：赵书彬 Zhao Shubin

机构地区：[1]西藏日报社,拉萨850000

出　　处：《西藏研究》2023年第5期60-68,161,共10页Tibetan Studies

基　　金：中宣部宣传思想文化青年英才支持项目“西藏实际:从理论内涵、实践要求到思想教育的专题研究”阶段性成果。

摘　　要：“西藏实际”是中国共产党成功运用马克思主义中国化创新理论,不断认识西藏客观事物、推进治藏实践时产生的特定理论概念,也是评断历史上实践成败的一个重要衡量标准。“西藏实际”具有主观与客观、全局与局部、共性与个性、历史与阶段、一体与多元相统一的重要意涵。以“西藏实际”视角出发来考察清末革新藏政及其相关研究可以发现,清末革新藏政对西藏实际的认识更倾向于政治性、全局性、共同性、一体性,而相关研究的评价对西藏实际的认识更倾向于局部性、特殊性、多元性,应该说这两种对“西藏实际”的认识都不符合西藏实际,都对西藏实际作出了片面的理解,割裂了普遍性与特殊性的辩证统一关系。“Tibet reality”is a specific theoretical concept produced by the Communist Party of China(CPC)when it successfully applied the innovative theory of Marxism in China to continuously understand Tibet objectively and promote the practice of governing Tibet,and it is also an important criterion for judging the success or failure of practice in history.“Tibet reality”has the important meaning of balancing subjectivity and objectivity,overall and partial,commonality and individuality,history and stage,unity and pluralism.From the perspective of“Tibet reality”,it can be found that the understanding ofpolitics Tibet in the late Qing Dynasty is more political,overall,common,and integral,while the evaluation of relevant studies is more inclined to be local,special,and pluralistic.

关 键 词：清末革新藏政 西藏实际 “两权说” 张荫棠 

分 类 号：K252[历史地理—历史学] K29[历史地理—中国史]