检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宗雪萍[1] 时裕 ZONG Xue-ping;SHI Yu(School of Law,Jiangxi University of Science and Technology,Ganzhou,Jiangxi 341000,China)
出 处:《华北理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第6期14-20,共7页Journal of North China University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:2021年度江西省高校人文社会科学研究基地课题“双碳目标视野下绿色金融法律制度创新研究”(JD21091)。
摘 要:2023年是我国“双碳”目标实现进程中的关键阶段,“双碳”目标的落实及相关支持性政策的密集出台意味着绿色金融发展迎来新机遇,与机遇永远相伴随的是风险,发展完善风险法律防范模式是我国保持生态环境与社会经济可持续性发展的重要保障。通过梳理比较绿色金融风险法律防范的两种模式,分析当前我国绿色金融风险防范法治面临立法与实际相背离导致的政策风险、信息不对称导致的“洗绿”风险和标准划分不一带来的技术转型风险等突出问题,从调整立法基础、监管机制和设立中国标准三个维度探索构建符合本土国情的三元立法体系的新模式。2023 is a critical stage in the process of realizing the"dual carbon"goal in China.The implementation of the"double carbon"goal and the intensive issuance of relevant supporting policies mean that the development of green finance ushers in new opportunities,and the opportunities are always accompanied by risks.The development and improvement of the legal risk prevention model is an important guarantee for China to maintain the sustainable development of the ecological environment and social economy.By sorting out and comparing the two models of legal prevention of green finance risks,this paper analyzes the policy risks caused by the deviation of legislation from reality,the"green washing"risks caused by asymmetric information,and the risk of technological transformation caused by different standards of green finance risk prevention in China Exploring a new model of building a ternary legislative system that is in line with local conditions from three dimensions:regulatory mechanisms and the establishment of Chinese standards.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.140.129