检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵晓彬[1] 宋淑凤 Zhao Xiaobin;Song Shufeng
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨师范大学斯拉夫语学院
出 处:《俄罗斯文艺》2023年第4期103-114,共12页Russian Literature & Arts
基 金:国家社会科学基金规划项目“什克洛夫斯基文艺理论与批评范式研究”(21BWW001)。
摘 要:俄国著名的文论家什克洛夫斯基和雅各布森,都与同时代未来主义诗人马雅可夫斯基关系甚密,并都对后者有过诸多的理论阐述,但二者对马雅可夫斯基及其创作的评说却存在着较大的差异性。两位批评家在剖析马雅可夫斯基的诗歌、比较马雅可夫斯基与帕斯捷尔纳克的创作、论述马雅可夫斯基死因等方面,均体现出二者作为形式主义和结构主义两种诗学理论代表之间的学术纷争。The two renowned Russian literary theorists,V.Shklovsky and R.Jakobson,had a close relationship with their contemporary poet of futurism,V.Mayakovsky.Both of them conducted considerable theoretical researches into the poet.However,their criticism of Mayakovsky and his works is hugely different.The differences can be found in their analysis of his poetry,comparisons between Mayakovsky's and Pasternak's works and interpretation of the cause of Mayakovsky's death.These divergent views are also indicators of the academic disagreement between V.Shklovsky and R.Jacobson as the foremost representatives of two theories of poetics,formalism and structuralism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.192.254