检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李帅 梅妮 张皖晋 李刚 吴浩 陈桂良 魏春敏 王莹 LI Shuai;MEI Ni;ZHANG Wanjin;LI Gang;WU Hao;CHEN Guiliang;WEI Chunmin;WANG Ying(Shanghai Center for Drug Evaluation and Inspection,Shanghai 201210;Center for Drug Evaluation,NMPA,Beijing 100022;Center for Food and Drug Inspection of NMPA,Beijing 100044)
机构地区:[1]上海药品审评核查中心,上海201210 [2]国家药品监督管理局药品审评中心,北京100022 [3]国家药品监督管理局食品药品审核查验中心,北京100044
出 处:《中国医药工业杂志》2023年第9期1360-1366,共7页Chinese Journal of Pharmaceuticals
摘 要:该研究回顾性分析了8个配体结合分析项目(5个验证项目和3个样品分析项目)。这些项目涉及3个不同的分析平台[ELISA、单分子免疫阵列(Simoa)和电化学发光免疫分析技术(MSD)]和3种不同的分子类型(单克隆抗体、蛋白类生物标志物和中和抗体药物),对这些项目数据分别采用单孔分析和复孔分析的方式进行检测。分析结果显示,在孔间变异较小(<5%)的情况下,单孔分析和复孔分析方式所得结果之间存在良好的相关性,并且计算得到的主要药动学参数(AUC和c_(max))之间没有显著性差异,可以将单孔分析替代复孔分析应用于上述分析平台。This study aimed to retrospectively analyze eight ligand binding assay projects,including five validations and three sample analyses.These projects involved three analysis platforms[ELISA,single molecule array(Simoa),and meso scale discovery(MSD)]and three distinct molecular types(monoclonal antibodies,protein biomarkers,and neutralizing antibodies).The data from above projects were respectively analyzed by singlicate-and replicate-based analysis.The analysis results revealed a strong correlation between singlicate-and duplicate-based analysis when the inter well variability was below 5%.Additionally,there were no significant differences in the calculation results of the key pharmacokinetic parameters(AUC and c_(max))between singlicate-and duplicate-based analysis.Thus,the result suggest that singlicate-base analysis can be a viable alternative to duplicate-based analysis on the aforementioned analysis platforms.
分 类 号:R917[医药卫生—药物分析学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.179