检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李超 袁秦波 谢杰 王强东 Li Chao;Yuan Qinbo;Xie Jie;Wang Qiangdong(Department of Urology,the Fifth People's Hospital of Wuxi,Wuxi 214000,China;Department of Urology,Huaiyin People's Hospital of Huaian City,Huaian 223300,China)
机构地区:[1]无锡市第五人民医院泌尿外科,无锡214000 [2]江苏省淮安市淮阴人民医院泌尿外科,淮安223300
出 处:《国际泌尿系统杂志》2023年第6期988-991,共4页International Journal of Urology and Nephrology
基 金:2019年度淮安市卫生健康科研项目(HAWJ201928)。
摘 要:目的探讨可视经皮肾穿刺在无积水或微量积水肾结石中的应用价值。方法收集2019年12月至2021年12月无锡市第五人民医院与江苏省淮安市淮阴医院收治的41例无积水或微量积水肾结石患者的临床资料, 其中采用传统经皮肾穿刺20例(传统经皮肾穿刺组), 采用可视经皮肾穿刺21例(可视经皮肾穿刺组)。比较分析两组的单次穿刺成功率、单次建立皮肾通道成功率、导丝置入肾盂例数、穿刺并建立皮肾通道时间、形成假道例数等指标。结果传统经皮肾穿刺组行单通道取石16例, 双通道取石4例;可视经皮肾穿刺组行单通道取石16例, 双通道取石5例。两组通道数量比较, 差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);可视经皮肾穿刺组的单次穿刺成功率、单次建立皮肾通道成功率、导丝置入肾盂例数、穿刺并建立皮肾通道时间优于传统经皮肾穿刺组, 但差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。传统经皮肾穿刺组形成假道的例数多于可视经皮肾穿刺组, 但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论可视经皮肾穿刺可以提高穿刺及建立皮肾通道的成功率, 增加手术安全性, 缩短术者的学习曲线。Objective To investigate the application value of visual percutaneous renal puncture in the treatment of kidney stones without or with minimal hydrops.Methods A total of 41 patients with kidney stones without hydrops or trace hydrops were selected from the Fifth People's Hospital of Wuxi City and Huaiyin Hospital of Huaian City,Jiangsu Province from December 2019 to December 2021.Among them,20 patients were treated with traditional percutaneous kidney puncture(traditional percutaneous kidney puncture group)and 21 patients were treated with visual percutaneous kidney puncture(visual percutaneous kidney puncture group).The success rate of single puncture,the success rate of single establishment of cutaneous renal channel,the number of cases of renal pelvis insertion with guide wire,the time of puncture and establishment of cutaneous renal channel,and the number of cases of formation of false channel were compared between the two groups.Results In the traditional percutaneous renal puncture group,16 patients received single channel lithotomy and 4 patients received double channel lithotomy.In the visual percutaneous kidney puncture group,16 patients underwent single channel lithotomy and 5 patients underwent double channel lithotomy.There was no significant dfference in the number of channels between the two groups(P>0.05).There were no significant differences between the two groups in the success rate of single puncture,the success rate of single establishment of cutaneous renal channel,the number of renal pelvis insertion cases,and the time of puncture and establishment of cutaneous renal channel(all P>0.05).The number of cases forming false paths in the traditional percutaneous renal puncture group was higher than that in the visual percutaneous kidney puncture group,but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusions Visual puncture could improve the success rate of puncture and the establishment of percutaneous renal channel,increase the safety of surgery,and shorten the learning curve of t
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.193.237