条约解释中嗣后实践的基本构成和功能定位  

The Basic Elements and Functional Orientation of Subsequent Practice in Treaty Interpretation

作　　者：李想 LI Xiang(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《湖北职业技术学院学报》2023年第3期68-72,共5页Journal of Hubei Polytechnic Institute

摘　　要：嗣后实践是条约缔结后各当事国对条约的解释意思一致而适用条约的行为,可以作为一种解释条约的资料,但其识别方法缺少体系化的规范。嗣后实践的构成要素主要包括主体要素、主观要素和客观要素,其中主观要素是核心要素。研究嗣后实践与解释通则、演化解释、条约修订的关系,确定其功能定位,即它作为条约解释资料的工具地位、证明作用和独立价值。Subsequent practice refers to the consistent and applicable actions by the parties after the conclusion of the treaty in interpreting its meaning.It can be used as a means of treaty interpretation,but lacks systematic norms for its identification.Drawing on international judicial precedents,the core constituent elements of subsequent practice include the elements of subjectivity,subjective elements and objective elements,of which subjective elements are the core elements.Furthermore,the relationship between subsequent practice and general principles of interpretation,evolutionary interpretation and treaty revision is examined to determine its functional role,namely its position as a tool for treaty interpretation,its evidential role and its independent value.

关 键 词：条约解释 嗣后实践 意思一致 解释资料 《维也纳条约法公约》 

分 类 号：DF90[政治法律—国际法学]