检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁潇云 Liang Xiaoyun(Criminal Investigation Police University of China,Shenyang 110854)
机构地区:[1]中国刑事警察学院,沈阳110854
出 处:《西部学刊》2023年第22期79-82,共4页Journal of Western
摘 要:量刑规范化改革实施后,有关方面在实践中不断积累经验,多次修改、改进,为规范量刑活动、促进量刑公正起到了积极的作用。与此同时,我国刑法中关于量刑规范化的探讨与结果也遭到了许多理论与实践的质疑。其中,以量刑规范化改革的结果有悖于量刑责任原则,主张将责任刑情节与防止刑情节分开的批评意见尤其普遍,这种划分方式是值得深入反思的。文章对区分责任刑情节与预防刑情节观点进行反思,提出回归量刑应以责任为基础,剖析基准刑的确定与责任主义、宣告刑的确定与责任主义的关系,进一步夯实量刑规范化改革的理论根基。With the implementation of the reform of sentencing standardization,relevant parties have continuously accumulated expeni-ence,made multiple revisions,and improvements,which has played a positive role in standardizing sentencing activities and promoting sentencing justice.At the same time,discussions and outcomes related to sentencing standardization in China's criminal law have been questioned in theory and in practice.Among them,since the results of the reform of sentencing standardization are contrary to the principle of sentencing responsibility,the opinion of dividing responsibility-based punishment from prevention-based punishment is particularly prevalent.This division deserves in-depth reflection.Therefore,this paper reflects on this viewpoint and proposes a retum to sentencing based on responsibility.This paper also analyzes the baseline sentencing,declaratory sentencing and their relationships with the principle of responsibility,further solidifying the theoretical foundation of the reform of senteneing standardization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49