检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲜文玺 Xian Wenxi(Qingdao University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266061)
机构地区:[1]青岛科技大学,青岛266061
出 处:《西部学刊》2023年第22期83-86,共4页Journal of Western
摘 要:在《民法典》实施的背景下,民事自助行为制度的确立为权利人提供了新的救济手段。然而,直接涉及他人人身权利的人身拘束型自助行为,其正当性认定和规范运用仍不甚明晰。从法理、法律和司法基础三个视角论证了人身拘束型自助行为的正当内核,并分析了其有待进一步明晰之处:(一)人身拘束型自助行为规范适用的具体条件;(二)人身拘束型自助行为规范超越的法律后果适用。With the implementation of the Civil Code,the establishment of the system of civil self-help actions provides new remedies for right holders.However,the legtimacy and applicable specification of personal restraint self-help actions,which directly involve the personal rights of others,remain unclear.This paper argues for the legitimate core of personal restraint self-help actions from three per-spectives:legal principle,law,and judicial basis,and analyzes areas that require further clarification:(1)the specifie conditions for the application of personal restraint self-help actions,(2)the applcation of legal consequences for personal restraint self-help actions that go beyond its application specification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70