检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘嵩岩 LIU Song-yan(School of Law,University of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China)
出 处:《晋中学院学报》2023年第6期56-62,共7页Journal of Jinzhong University
摘 要:关于检察权性质定位之争一直未有定数,但检察权的应然形态、价值品性却鲜有论证。在制约权力、监督权力的使命承担中,检察权有四个维度的价值内涵:以公平正义为价值基石,以保障人权为价值义务,以均衡利益为价值导向,以稳定秩序为价值结果。目前我国检察权具体的实现方式有制约与监督刑事司法权力、监督民事和行政诉讼活动、公益诉讼检察限制权力侵扰三种。The controversy over the nature and positioning of procuratorial power has not been determined,but there is little debate on the proper form and value of procuratorial power.In the mission of restricting power and supervising power,procuratorial power has four dimensions of value connotation:fairness and justice as the cornerstone of value,protection of human rights as value obligation,balanced interests as value orientation,and stability and order as the value result.At present,there are three specific ways to realize procuratorial power in China:restricting and supervising criminal justice power,supervising civil and administrative litigation activities,and restricting power and intrusion in public interest litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38