标准必要专利全球许可费率管辖权之争——各国管辖根据与中国司法选择  

The Ascertainment Of Jurisdiction Of The Global License Rate For Standard Essential Patents——Jurisdictional Basis Of Various Countries And Judicial Choice Of China

作　　者：徐瑄[1] 区婉珊 Xu Xuan;Ou Wanshan

机构地区：[1]暨南大学知识产权研究院 [2]暨南大学法学院/知识产权学院

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2023年第8期4-18,共15页Electronics Intellectual Property

基　　金：最高人民法院2022司法研究重大课题“标准必要专利许可条件法律问题研究”(项目编号:ZGFYZDKT202215-02)。

摘　　要：在当事人没有达成管辖合意的情况下,一国法院裁判标准必要专利全球许可费率是否会造成司法管辖权冲突,如何理解专利权地域性、专属管辖与裁判全球许可费率的关系,如何确定一国法院裁判全球许可费率的管辖根据,上述问题迫切需要厘清和解决。纵观域外司法实践,主要司法辖区依据不同管辖根据确立裁判全球许可费率的管辖权。在借鉴域外司法经验的基础上,建议我国统一各类标准必要专利纠纷的民事案由为“标准必要专利许可纠纷”,降低更密切联系的要求,修改不方便法院原则的审查标准和法律后果,以及完善管辖权异议规则,为实质性解决标准必要专利许可争议贡献中国司法的理性和智慧。If the parties fail to reach a jurisdictional agreement,the issues need to be clarified and solved urgently:whether the courts of a country judge the global license conditions will cause a conflict of jurisdiction,how to understand the relationship between the regionality of patent right and exclusive jurisdiction,and how to determine the jurisdictional basis for the courts of a country to judge the global license rate.By drawing on foreign judicial experience,it is suggested that China should unify the cause of the action as"standard essential patent licensing disputes",reduce the requirement of the"the standard of more significant relationship",modify the review criteria and legal application consequences of the forum-non-convenience doctrine,improve the rules of jurisdictional objection,and contribute to the rationality and wisdom of China's judiciary to solve the FRAND dispute.

关 键 词：FRAND 全球许可费率 管辖根据 

分 类 号：D997.1[政治法律—国际法学] D923.42[政治法律—法学]