嘲戏非清谈源流辨  

Differentiate and Analyse on Humorous Satirical Talk not the Origin of Metaphysical Discussion

作　　者：龚斌[1] GONG Bin(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中文系,上海200241

出　　处：《云梦学刊》2023年第6期116-122,共7页Journal of Yunmeng

摘　　要：魏晋清谈的源流与东汉末年学术风气的转变、人物品题由具象至抽象的变化等因素有关。清谈是雅谈、美论、正论,它最有价值的部分是“三玄”(《易》《老子》《庄子》)的谈论,在中国思想史和哲学史上具有重要的学术意义。清谈又是一种语言艺术,是经过修饰的“雅调”,娓娓动听。在有关魏晋清谈的研究中,有一种观点认为嘲戏是清谈的源流。其实,嘲戏归嘲戏,清谈归清谈,二者谈论的内容与语言风格都有很大差异。嘲戏非清谈源流。认为嘲戏是清谈之源,是误解了清谈的性质,会弱化清谈的学术价值。The origin of the metaphysical discussion in Wei-Jin Dynasties was related to many factors such as the change of academic atmosphere in the late Eastern Han Dynasty and the transformation of character appraising from concreteness to abstraction.Metaphysical discussion was elegant,graceful and formal.The most valuable part of it was the discussion about"Three Xuan"(The Book of Change,Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu),which has important academic significance in the history of Chinese thought and philosophy.Metaphysical discussion was also a kind of language arts because it had been decorated with pleasant and elegant tone.There is a viewpoint in the study of metaphysical discussion in Wei-Jin Dynasties that humorous satirical talk was its origin.Actually,humorous satirical talk was entirely different from metaphysical discussion in content and language style.Therefore,humorous satirical talk was not the origin of metaphysical discussion.If considering humorous satirical talk as the origin of metaphysical discussion,the nature of metaphysical discussion would be misunderstood and its academic value would be weakened.

关 键 词：清谈源流 雅论美谈 嘲戏 清谈的性质与价值 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]