检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王治钧 贺颖[1] WANG Zhijun;HE Ying(School of Management,Tianjin Normal University,393 Binshui Road,Xiqing District,Tianjin 300387,China)
出 处:《中国科技期刊研究》2023年第9期1138-1145,共8页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“基于区块链的科学论文开放式同行评议质量控制研究”(20BTQ084);天津师范大学研究生科研创新重点项目“开放式同行评议的区块链系统架构设计研究”(2022KYCX021Z)。
摘 要:【目的】利用区块链技术防范应对同行评议中的学术失范问题,为学术出版信任体系构建提供参考。【方法】分析同行评议中的学术失范表现形式及当前防控学术失范的方法和手段,根据区块链的技术特性,采用区块链应对学术失范。【结果】借助区块链技术,可以更好地落实当前应用的制度、模式与技术上的防控手段,有效防范传统同行评议中存在的由主观意愿造成的学术不端和由客观因素导致的技术性学术失范。【结论】通过利用区块链的非对称加密、共识机制、智能合约等技术完善开放式同行评议,可从制度和技术双方面入手规范学者行为,有效地减少当前同行评议中的学术失范情况,实现负责任研究与创新。[Purposes]This paper aims to prevent and respond to academic misconduct in peer review by using blockchain technology and provide a reference for the construction of a trust system of academic publication.[Methods]We analyzed the manifestation of academic misconduct in peer review and the current methods and means to prevent and control academic misconduct.According to the technical characteristics of blockchain,we used blockchain to cope with academic misconduct.[Findings]With the help of blockchain technology,the current system,model,and technical means of prevention and control can be better realized,and the academic misconduct caused by subjective perspectives and technical academic misconduct caused by objective factors existing in traditional peer review can be effectively prevented.[Conclusions]By using asymmetric encryption,consensus mechanism,smart contracts,and other blockchain technologies to improve open peer review,we can regulate the behavior of scholars from both institutional and technical aspects,effectively reduce the current academic misconduct in peer review,and realize responsible research and innovation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.60.85