检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:麦买提·乌斯曼[1] Mamat Osman(Xinjiang Agricultural University,Urumqi 830052)
机构地区:[1]新疆农业大学法学院
出 处:《犯罪研究》2023年第4期19-30,共12页Chinese Criminology Review
基 金:新疆维吾尔自治区社会科学基金项目“未成年人罪错行为分级干预机制研究”(项目编号:22BFX042)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:在信息时代,刑法积极回应公民个人信息保护已成为主流,然而这在一定程度上也破坏了公民个人信息保护的完整性和系统性。公民个人信息的保护仍然需要以罪刑法定原则、刑法谦抑性为基础的刑法消极回应。刑法的消极回应是公民个人信息刑法治理和刑法规制稳定的需要。在预防公民个人信息危险时,应当在坚守多元治理规范框架的前提下,将侵犯公民个人信息罪中的公民个人信息限缩解释为可直接识别特定个人身份的公民个人信息。In the information age,the proactive response of the criminal law to the protection of citizens'personal information has become the tendency,but to some extent,it has sabotaged the completeness and systematicness of the protection of citizens'personal information.The protection of citizens'personal information still requires the passive response of criminal law based on the traditional principle of legality and the modesty of criminal law,and the passive response is necessary to the criminal law governance of citizens'personal information and the stability of criminal law regulation.For the purpose of preventing the risks regarding citizens'personal information,we should stick to the premise of diversified governance norms,and limit the scope of the citizens'personal information in the crime of infringing upon citizens'personal information to the information that can be used to directly identify specific citizenship.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44