检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄鳞婷 HUANG Lin-ting(Guangxi Normal University,Guilin Guangxi 541000,China)
机构地区:[1]广西师范大学,广西桂林541000
出 处:《齐齐哈尔高等师范专科学校学报》2023年第5期47-49,共3页Journal of Qiqihar Teachers College
摘 要:伴随我国经济社会的发展,既涉及刑事犯罪又涉及民事纠纷的刑民交叉案件正在不断增多。当前,关于刑民交叉案件的司法实践面临着亟待解决的如证据交互使用的缺乏等典型问题。基于刑民交叉案件中证据交互使用的必要性与可行性,应从明确刑民交叉案件证据交互使用的范围、制定刑事证据在民事诉讼中的适用规则、制定民事证据在刑事诉讼中的适用规则、区分不同刑事责任对证据交互使用的影响等方面构建刑民交叉案件证据交互使用规则。With the development of China's economy and society,the cases involving both criminal crimes and civil disputes are increasing.At present,the judicial practice of criminal and civil cross cases is faced with typical problems that need to be solved urgently,such as the lack of mutual use of evidence.Due to the necessity and feasibility of mutual use of evidence in criminal and civilian cross cases,we should clarify the scope of evidence mutual use in criminal and civilian cross cases,formulate the applicable rules of criminal evidence in civil proceedings,formulate the applicable rules of civil evidence in criminal proceedings,distinguish the influence of different criminal responsibilities on evidence mutual use and so on.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7