共享文档信息整合中的刑事风险与刑法应对  

Criminal Risks and Criminal Law Response in the Process of Information Integration through Shared Documents

作　　者：黄陈辰 HUANG Chen-chen(Law School,Minzu University of China,Beijing,100081)

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2023年第5期97-106,共10页Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“个人信息有序共享的刑民一体化保护研究”(20CFX027)。

摘　　要：相对于传统本地文档而言,以实时协同为主要特征的共享文档更有利于提高信息整合效率,保障信息内容即时更新,但其亦为侵犯公民个人信息类犯罪提供滋生的土壤,导致犯罪手段升级、犯罪场景新增、涉案信息数量更大、信息流转范围更广等问题。此类刑事风险对公民个人信息权益及与之关联的人身、财产权益造成严重威胁,亟需刑法予以应对。共享文档信息整合过程中涉及文档创建者、转发者、填写者、修改者、副本制作者、持有者等多方主体,各主体扮演的角色不同,具体行为方式也存在差异,因而应基于类型化思维,针对不同主体的典型行为类型分别进行考量,判断该行为是否符合侵犯公民个人信息罪之行为要件,以确定具体的刑法规制进路。涉案信息数量的大小对于行为人罪与非罪的判断与刑罚轻重的裁量至关重要,在进行数量认定时,不仅应关注一般认定规则,还应考量由共享文档多人协同编辑、内容实时更新等特性所导致的特殊情形的处理。Compared to traditional local documents,shared documents with real-time collaboration as the main feature are more conducive to improving information integration efficiency and ensuring real-time updates of information content.However,they also provide a breeding ground for crimes that infringe on citizens'personal information,leading to upgraded criminal methods,new crime scenes,a larger amount of involved information,and a wider range of information circulation.This type of criminal risk poses a serious threat to citizens'personal information rights and their associated personal and property rights,and urgently requires criminal law to address it.The process of using shared documents for information integration involves multiple subjects such as document creators,retweeters,fillers,modifiers,replica creators,and holders.Each subject assumes different roles and has differences in specific behavior.Based on typological thinking,typical behavior types of different subjects should be considered separately to determine whether they meet the behavioral requirements of the crime of infringing on citizens'personal information,and to determine the specific path of criminal law regulation.The amount of information involved in the case is crucial for determining whether the perpetrator is guilty or not,as well as for determining the severity of the punishment.When determining the quantity,attention should not only be paid to general identification rules but also to the handling of special situations caused by the collaborative editing and real-time updating of content by multiple people in shared documents.

关 键 词：共享文档 刑事风险 侵犯公民个人信息罪 公开信息 数量认定 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]