检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尤婷婷 张利平 祁国梅 龙长权 YOU Tingting;ZHANG Liping;QI Guomei;LONG Changquan(Faculty of Psychology,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China)
机构地区:[1]西南大学心理学部,重庆400715
出 处:《心理学报》2023年第12期1997-2012,共16页Acta Psychologica Sinica
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划青年基金(18YJC190015)。
摘 要:以往的研究表明,机会公平会影响个体实际结果的评价,但尚不清楚这种影响是仅发生在早期阶段还是同时发生在早期和晚期阶段。本研究采用事件相关电位技术,控制主观预期与实际预期的差异以及个体机会数的变化,并进行主成分分析以控制脑电成分的重叠,探讨了在竞争情境中,机会公平影响个体实际结果评价的认知加工进程。实验采用3(机会条件:有利机会不公平(AI)、机会公平(OE)、不利机会不公平(DI))×3(实际结果:赢、平局、输)被试内实验设计。行为结果表明,机会公平和个人实际结果在愉悦感评分上存在显著交互作用,表明机会公平会影响个体对实际结果的评价。ERP结果表明,当被试赢时,三种机会条件诱发的原始FRN和PCA-FRN波幅无显著差异;当被试输时,AI和DI比OE诱发了更负的原始FRN和PCA-FRN波幅,表明机会公平在认知加工的早期阶段影响个体实际结果的评价,当处境不利时,个体对机会公平更加敏感。同时,机会条件不影响原始P300和PCA-P300波幅,平局比输和赢诱发了更大的PCA-P300波幅,这表明在个体实际结果评价的晚期加工阶段,更重视结果公平,对公平的结果投入了更多的注意资源。这些结果表明机会公平对个体实际结果评价的影响主要发生在早期阶段,支持了“人们对结果公平的关注强于机会公平”这一假说。Opportunity equity is highly desired in human society.Previous studies have shown that opportunity(in)equity influences the evaluation of subsequent outcomes.However,it is unclear whether this influence occurs only at an early cognitive stage or extends to a late cognitive stage as well.Based on the notion that“people seem to be more committed to outcome equity than opportunity equity,”we hypothesized that opportunity(in)equity would affect outcome evaluation at an early stage in the cognitive process,but not at a late stage.Additionally,we indicate how limitations in the experimental design and data analysis of previous studies may have affected their conclusions.To examine the cognitive stage at which opportunity(in)equity influences outcome evaluations in a competitive social context,we recruited 31 college students(19 females,19.52±1.46 years)to participate in a competitive two-person choice game with their opponents.To account for the difference between subjective and objective predictions and the effect of varied choice numbers,we designed the game so that the participants had four cards in all trials.In contrast,their opponents randomly received two,four,or six cards in each trial,creating three opportunity conditions:advantageous opportunity inequity(AI),opportunity equity(OE),and disadvantageous opportunity inequity(DI).Both players selected only one card from the available options to compare their outcomes,which could result in a win,draw,or loss.Similar to previous studies,we recorded and analyzed event-related potential responses to actual outcomes,focusing on feedback-related negativity(FRN)and P300.We performed principal component analysis(PCA)to disentangle the overlap of FRN and P300.The analysis of behavioral results of our study demonstrated a significant interaction between opportunities and outcomes in relation to subjective pleasantness rating scores,indicating that opportunity(in)equity indeed influenced outcome evaluation.Furthermore,we found a significant interaction between opportuni
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.166.40