检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:廖琳艳 LIAO Linyan(Department of Immunological Planning,Xianyang Central Health Hospital in Pucheng County,Pucheng 353409,China)
机构地区:[1]福建省浦城县仙阳中心卫生院免疫规划科,福建浦城353409
出 处:《中国医药指南》2023年第33期161-163,共3页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的分析慢性阻塞性肺疾病(慢阻肺)患者接受多方位呼吸功能改善干预对其生活质量的影响。方法取慢阻肺患者作本研究对象,共纳入70例,纳入时间:2021年1月至2022年12月。按照随机数字表法,将所纳入的研究对象分组,即对照组(35例)、观察组(35例)。常规护理给予对照组,观察组接受多方位呼吸功能改善干预。比较两组的护理效果。结果护理后,观察组的生活质量评分高于对照组,肺功能指标水平高于对照组,呼吸困难程度评分低于对照组,6 min步行距离大于对照组,护理满意度(97.14%)高于对照组(80.00%),P<0.05。结论慢阻肺患者接受多方位呼吸功能改善干预,能够有效提升其肺功能、生活质量和运动能力水平,呼吸困难症状减轻,护理满意度高。Objective To analyze the effect of multi-directional intervention to improve respiratory function on quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD).Methods Copd patients were selected as the subjects of this study.A total of 70 patients were included,and the inclusion time was from January 2021 to December 2022.According to the random number table method,the included subjects were divided into control group(35 cases)and observation group(35 cases).Conventional care was given to the control group,and the observation group received multi-directional intervention to improve respiratory function.The nursing effect of the two groups was compared.Results After nursing,the quality of life score,lung function index level,dyspnea degree score of observation group were higher than control group,6 min walking distance was higher than control group,nursing satisfaction(97.14%)was higher than control group(80.00%),P<0.05.Conclusions Patients with COPD receive multi-directional intervention to improve respiratory function,which can effectively improve their lung function,quality of life and exercise ability,reduce dyspnea symptoms,and have high nursing satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38