官无悔判:往日遭际、古代语境及其现代意义挖掘  

No Abrogation of Verdict:The Past and the Present

作　　者：霍存福[1] HUO Cun-fu

机构地区：[1]沈阳师范大学法学院,沈阳110034

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2023年第6期135-157,233,234,共25页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(19AFX003)。

摘　　要：对“官无毁判”的訾评,最早出现于谢觉哉1943年的会议发言及日记;对“官无悔判”的大规模批判,在1952年司法改革运动中达到了高峰;流风所及,至今仍有对其持批评或否定态度者。批判者将其视为旧司法被动、教条、形式主义的反映,有来历,有典据;否定者将其作为旧衙门颟顸、专横的代名词,则可能是一个重大误解。因为“官无悔判”的原型是“官无悔笔”,语境是“官无悔笔,罪不重科”。如今,除了需要稍费笔墨为其正名、确诂其古义外,挖掘并赋予其现代意义,揭示其与“一事不再理”(或“禁止双重危险原则”)等民事、刑事诉讼原则的相通蕴意,可以为中华古法谚的创造性转化与创新性发展提供一个导向性的范例。The critique of“no abrogation of verdict”principle first appeared in Xie Juezai’s conference speech and his diary in 1943,and then reached its peak in the judicial reform movement in 1952.Until now there are still some criti⁃cism and denying of this principle.The criticism that it is a reflection of the passivity,dogmatism and formalism of the old judicial system does make some sense since it is supported by evidence.It might be a major misunderstanding for the denying ideas which equates it with muddling and arbitrariness.This principle originated from the idea that“the issued documents cannot be abrogated and no person shall be charged twice for the same offence”.At present,not only the defi⁃nition of the principle should be clarified,but also its connotation and significance should be explored in modern context.As a matter of fact, it has something in common with “ne bis in idem” (or the rule against double jeopardy) in nowa⁃days civil and criminal litigation principles, and it exemplifies the creative transformation and innovative development ofancient Chinese legal practice.

关 键 词：官无悔判 官无悔笔 罪不重科 司法改革运动 一事不再理 禁止双重危险原则 创造性转化与创新性发展 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学] D925.2