检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金仁淑[1] JIN Renshu(Business School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing,100088,China)
出 处:《日本问题研究》2023年第4期29-40,共12页Japanese Research
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“构建人类命运共同体进程中国际经贸规则重构博弈与中国的战略选择”(19ZDA053);中国政法大学科研创新引导专项项目“中美贸易摩擦背景下加深中日经贸合作路径及对策研究”(10821437)。
摘 要:20世纪70年代为了应对两次石油危机、滞胀及国内经济低迷,日本实施了以出口拉动经济的“外需主导型”经济发展战略,引发了日美之间激烈的贸易摩擦。在内外压力下,日本从20世纪80年代以来一直致力于重建“内需主导型”的经济发展战略,不仅制定了推进“内需主导型”经济发展战略目标,而且也实施了一系列扩大内需的宏观经济政策:即通过技术创新实现产业结构优化,提升经济增长质量等。但由于日本构建“内需主导型”经济结构改革滞后、宏观调控政策屡次失误、国际竞争力下降,因此,至今未能转向“内需主导型”经济发展。显然,日本经济“结构改革悖论”对中国构建“双循环”发展格局具有重要的启示与借鉴意义。In the 1970s,in order to cope with the two oil crises,stagflation,and domestic economic downturn,Japan implemented the “external demand-oriented” economic development strategy,which led to the fierce trade friction between Japan and the United States.Under the internal and external pressure,Japan has been committed to the reconstruction of the “domestic demand-led” economic development strategy since the 1980s.It not only formulated the strategic goal of promoting the “domestic demand-led” economic development,but also implemented a series of macroeconomic policies to expand domestic demand,that is,to optimize the industrial structure through technological innovation,improve the quality of economic growth and so on.However,Japan has not been able to turn to the “domestic demand-oriented” economic development because of the lagging reform of the “domestic demand-oriented” economic structure,the repeated mistakes of macroeconomic regulation and control policies,and the decline of international competitiveness.Obviously,Japan's economic “structural reform paradox”has important reference significance for China to build a “double circulation” development pattern.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49