捻军:历史人类学可以问什么问题?  

The Nian Army:What Questions can Historical Anthropology Ask?

作　　者：科大卫[1] David Faure(Department of History,The Chinese University of Hong Kong)

机构地区：[1]香港中文大学历史系,中国香港

出　　处：《清史研究》2023年第6期12-23,共12页The Qing History Journal

摘　　要：捻军的历史是清史研究范围内一个长期被关注的问题,也是一个多年来历史学者配合田野考察与文献考据作为研究方法的问题。本文从20世纪50年代以江地与马昌华先生为首的田野考察与文献研究出发,提出近年来历史人类学从“礼仪标签”的概念所能引申的问题。本文考虑把“捻”或“捻子”作为一个行为的标签,放到法律文书,对“捻”在文献出现的频繁有没有影响。再者,所谓“结捻”的群众,为什么会在太平军北伐的时候竖旗起义。The history of the Nian Army has been a long-standing interest in the study of Qing history.It has also long been a subject in which field research is combined with documentary analysis.This paper takes as its starting point the field and documentary research conducted by Professors Jiang Di and Ma Changhua in the 1950s,and poses questions that arise from looking at the word“Nian”as a“ritual marker”.It asks if adding the word to the Qing code had made any difference to reports on Nian activities,and,also,why people said to be organized in“nian”would have risen in rebellion at the time of the Taiping northern expedition.

关 键 词：捻 盐枭 礼仪标签 掠夺性策略 

分 类 号：K254.41[历史地理—历史学]