从《青城县志》看《聊斋志异》载唐梦赉女婿为假考  

Textual Criticism on TANG Menglai’s Son-in-law in Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio Base on County Annals of Qingcheng

作　　者：刘洪强[1] 张慧玲 LIU Hongqiang;ZHANG Huiling(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Shandong Normal University,Jinan,Shandong 250014,China;Zibo Experimental High School,Zibo,Shandong 255000,China)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学文学院,山东济南250014 [2]山东淄博实验中学,山东淄博255000

出　　处：《内江师范学院学报》2023年第11期1-8,共8页Journal of Neijiang Normal University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“中国古代方志稀见小说文献整理与研究”(19BZW092)。

摘　　要：从清朝康熙年间起,就有文献记载唐梦赉选青州神童为女婿,并且还有《聊斋志异》曾经记载此事的传闻,然而当下《聊斋志异》的所有版本中均未见有关内容。经考证,唐梦赉确实招过一位神童女婿,但《聊斋志异》却不可能载过此事。之所以出现《聊斋志异》曾经载过唐梦赉招女婿一事的观点,很可能是人们把《秋灯丛话》误认为是《聊斋志异》。Since the Kangxi Regime of the Qing Dynasty,there have been records in literature about TANG Menglai selecting a prodigy from Qingzhou as his son-in-law.It was also rumored that this incident was recorded in Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio.However,none of the existing versions of Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio currently include TANG’s story.After close examination,it has been verified that TANG did take a prodigy as his son-in-law,and it is unlikely that this event was ever recorded in Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio.The belief that the book included the story of TANG selecting a son-in-law most likely stems from the misconception of people mistaking Autumn Lantern Cluster for Strange Tales from a Chinese Studio.

关 键 词：聊斋志异 唐梦赉 陆陇其 秋灯丛话 青城县志 

分 类 号：I242[文学—中国文学]