“后现代”城市空间语言——语言景观透视  

“Postmodern”Urban Spatial Language-A Linguistic Landscape Perspective

作　　者：卢德平[1] 陈纪宁 LU Deping;CHEN Jining

机构地区：[1]北京语言大学语言学系,北京100083

出　　处：《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第6期78-86,共9页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：北京语言大学校级资助项目(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金)“对外汉语教育史研究”(17ZDJ01)。

摘　　要：城市空间语言是以空间为语境、以语言景观为载体、以人作为交流主体的语言形态,区别于作为自然语言的口语和书面语,是透视城市空间结构和社会发展规律的棱镜。语言景观不仅表征了空间的功能,还表征了城市空间中共存的“现代”和“后现代”两种生活方式。“现代”语言景观通过分类范畴安排空间,“现代”人的生活方式主要依托于空间的实体性功能服务。“后现代”语言景观通过修辞和多模态符号手段建构空间,其中内蕴的生活方式强调主体的观念和兴趣。两种类型的语言景观并置于城市,表明“现代”和“后现代”生活方式尚未形成明确界限。其中,选择“后现代”生活方式的社会群体总是能够在“现代”语境和“后现代”语境之间反复穿越。Distinguishing from spoken and written language,urban spatial language is defined as a kind of language in which space is the context,linguistic landscape the carrier,and people the main subject of communication.Urban spatial language serves as a prism to look into spatial structure of the city and the law of social development herein.Linguistic landscape not only presents the function of space,but also represents the coexistence of“modern”and“postmodern”lifestyles in the urban space.The“modern”linguistic landscape fulfills the role of arranging space in way of linguistic category,and the“modern”lifestyle de⁃pends mainly on the physical functional services of space.By contrast,the“postmodern”linguistic landscape configures space by means of rhetorical varieties and multimodal symbols.The postmodern lifestyle thus more attends to the subjective interest and idea.Juxtaposition of the two types of linguistic landscapes in city has actually blurred the boundary between“modern”and“post⁃modern”lifestyles.The social groups enjoying“postmodern”lifestyle have always been able to repeatedly traverse between“mod⁃ern”and“postmodern”contexts.

关 键 词：后现代 城市空间 语言景观 空间语言 生活方式 

分 类 号：H002[语言文字—语言学]