检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李艳兰[1] 钟碧莲 LI Yan-lan;ZHONG Bi-lian(College of Normal Education,Yichun University,Yichun 336000,China;Ruijin No.4 Middle School,Ganzhou 342500,China)
机构地区:[1]宜春学院师范教育学院,江西宜春336000 [2]瑞金市第四中学,江西赣州342500
出 处:《宜春学院学报》2023年第10期101-105,共5页Journal of Yichun University
基 金:江西省基础教育研究课题“共情视角下校园欺凌干预策略研究”(项目编号:SZUYCZH2021-1173)。
摘 要:采用中学生校园欺凌问卷、基本共情量表、儿童期虐待问卷对1024名初中生进行问卷调查,结果表明:初中校园受欺凌/欺凌现象比较普遍,但不严重,语言受欺凌/欺凌是主要方式;相关分析显示,认知共情与受欺凌/欺凌各因子呈显著负相关(P<0.05),情感共情与语言受欺凌、欺凌各因子呈显著负相关(P<0.01),情感虐待、躯体虐待、情感忽视、身体忽视与受欺凌/欺凌各因子呈显著正相关(P<0.05);回归分析显示,共情与受虐待经历在一定程度上预测初中生受欺凌/欺凌的发生,且认知共情比情感共情具有更强的影响。A total of 1024 junior high school students were selected by using School Student Bullying Questionnaire,Basic Empathy Scale and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.Results show that being bullied/bullying on junior middle school students was commom,but not serious,main expression of being bullied/bullying was verbal.Correlation analysis showed that cognitive empathy was negatively correlated with bullying/bullying factors(P<0.05),and affective empathy was negatively correlated with verbal bullied and bullying factors(P<0.01).Emotional abuse,physical abuse,emotional neglect and physical neglect were significantly positively correlated with being bullied/bullying factors(P<0.05).Regression analysis showed that empathy and abuse could predict school bullying,and cognitive empathy had stronger influence than affective empathy.
分 类 号:R195[医药卫生—卫生统计学] B844.2[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.167.178