氨煤掺混燃烧减碳方案经济性分析  

Economic Analysis of Carbon Reduction Scheme for Ammonia-Coal Blending Combustion

作　　者：张芮琳 王智化[1] 陈晨霖 何勇[1] 朱燕群[1] 岑可法[1] Zhang Ruilin;Wang Zhihua;Chen Chenlin;He Yong;Zhu Yanqun;Cen Kefa(State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310007,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学能源清洁利用国家重点实验室,杭州310007

出　　处：《燃烧科学与技术》2023年第6期667-675,共9页Journal of Combustion Science and Technology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金杰出青年基金资助项目(52125605).

摘　　要：利用平准化电力成本的模型方法对掺氨燃烧技术的经济可行性进行了评估.对在大型燃煤电厂1000MW机组上应用掺氨燃烧技术和碳捕集与封存技术(CCS)两种减碳方案的经济竞争力进行了比较;并针对未来氨成本降低和碳价、煤价升高的趋势,比较了氨煤混燃和纯煤燃烧两种情况的经济成本来进一步论证零碳氨替代燃料减碳方案的可行性.针对结果提出相关建议,弥补了当前关于氨燃料经济性评估方面研究的不足,论证了零碳氨燃料的市场推广价值.The economic feasibility of co-firing ammonia with coal was evaluated by the model method of levelized cost of electricity.The economic competitiveness of ammonia coal mixed combustion technology and carbon capture and storage technology(CCS)based on a 1000MW coal-fired power plant was compared.In view of the trend of fall in ammonia cost and rise in carbon and coal price in the future,the economic costs of ammonia coal mixed combustion and pure coal combustion were compared to further demonstrate the feasibility of non-carbon ammonia alternative fuel.Proposals are put forward in this paper according to the results,which makes up for the deficiency of current research on the economic evaluation of ammonia fuel,and demonstrates the popularization value of non-carbon ammonia fuel.

关 键 词：氨 煤 共燃 碳减排 经济性分析 

分 类 号：TK11[动力工程及工程热物理—热能工程]