钓鱼岛争端的搁置默契:从不涉及阶段到危机管控阶段  

Shelving Tacit Understanding of Diaoyu Islands Dispute:From No Mention Stage to Crisis Management Stage

作　　者：宋紫珍 SONG Zizhen(Faculty of Foreign Studies,Beijing Language and Culture University,Beijing 100083,China)

机构地区：[1]北京语言大学外国语学部,北京100083

出　　处：《宜宾学院学报》2023年第11期11-18,共8页Journal of Yibin University

摘　　要：在已有研究、历史事实、发展现状的基础上,不断变化的中日钓鱼岛争端的搁置默契可以分为三个阶段,即钓鱼岛主权争端的不涉及阶段、搁置默契受到挑战阶段、钓鱼岛主权争端的危机管控阶段。在搁置默契的这三个不同阶段下,中日双方单就钓鱼岛本身而言的“得失”不同:日方在不涉及阶段受益更多,强化了其对钓鱼岛的“管理权”;而中方则抓住了日方对搁置默契进行挑战阶段产生的机遇,在危机管控阶段常态化介入了钓鱼岛及其周围海域。Based on the existing researches,historical facts,and current development situations,the tacit understanding of shelving the Diaoyu Islands dispute that has been changing over time could be analyzed according to its three stages:no mention to the dispute stage,the tacit understanding being challenged stage,and crisis management stage.In these three stages,the“gains and losses”of China and Japan in terms of the Diaoyu Islands at different stages are different:Japan benefited more in the no mention to the dispute stage,and strengthened its“actual management”over the Diaoyu Islands then,while China seized the opportunity created in the tacit understanding being challenged stage,and intervened in practice in the Diaoyu Islands and its surrounding waters during the crisis management stage.

关 键 词：钓鱼岛 搁置默契 不涉及阶段 危机管控阶段 

分 类 号：D823[政治法律—政治学]