“毛泽东与抗日战争”研究中“史料论据”考辨——以所谓“七分发展,二分应付,一分抗日”方针为对象  

Examination and Verification of the“Historical Evidence”in the Study of“Mao Zedong and the Anti-Japanese War”--With the so-called“70% development,20% dealing with KMT,10% resistance against Japanese”policy as the object of refutation

作　　者：张海燕[1] 肖静雅 ZHANG Han-yan;XIAO Jing-ya(Research Center of Mao Zedong Thought,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411105,China)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学毛泽东思想研究中心,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第6期8-14,共7页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社科基地重大项目“毛泽东研究史料辩伪”(16JJD710011);湖南省研究生科研创新项目“马克思主义”与“三民主义”:国共两党意识形态教育比较研究(CX20210579)。

摘　　要：抗战期间,为赢得“思想战”胜利,国民党、日伪方面针对毛泽东及中国共产党制造了很多混淆事实真相的言论。历史虚无主义利用这些历史谣言,延续国民党的历史叙事逻辑和宣传手段,将单方面历史资料看作经多重考辨的“史料论据”用来支撑其观点,再通过网络世界的同质化、重复性宣传诱导受众接受其历史主张。因此,要坚持在唯物史观指导下,加强毛泽东与抗日战争研究的学术话语权和学术影响力,警惕从抗日战争时期缘起的“思想战”延伸至当前历史认知领域的“思想战”,从史料与思想上正本清源、固本培元。During the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression,in order to win the“ideological war”,the Kuomintang and the Japanese puppet regime fabricated a lot of statements against Mao Zedong and the CPC to obfuscate the truth.Historical nihilism makes use of those historical rumors to continue the historical narrative logic and propaganda means of the Kuomintang.It regards unilateral historical data as“historical evidence”through multiple textual research to support its view of historical nihilism,and then induces the audience to accept its historical claims through the homogenization and repetitive propaganda of the network world.Therefore,it is necessary to adhere to the guidance of historical materialism,strengthen the academic discourse and influence of Mao Zedong and the study of the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression,be vigilant about the extension of the“ideological war”from the period of the Anti-Japanese War to that in the current field of historical cognition,and rectify and consolidate historical data and ideas.

关 键 词：毛泽东 抗日战争 史料辨伪 

分 类 号：A84[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]