检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王海燕 于翠红 柳鑫淼 Wang Haiyan;Yu Cuihong;Liu Xinmiao(Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China;Yantai University,Yantai 264005,China;Beijing Foreign Studies University,Beijing 100081,China)
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学外国语学院,200240 [2]烟台大学外国语学院,264005 [3]北京外国语大学专门用途英语学院,100081
出 处:《北京第二外国语学院学报》2023年第5期50-66,共17页Journal of Beijing International Studies University
基 金:2022年国家社会科学基金重大项目“面向认知障碍相关脑疾病的临床话语分析理论体系构建研究”(项目编号:22&ZD298);2021年中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“语言产出的认知老化及其心理机制研究”(项目编号:2021JJ024);2020年北京市社会科学基金项目“汉语句子加工的认知老化及其神经机制”(项目编号:20YYC020)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:本研究追踪考察一位汉语布洛卡氏失语症患者在言语恢复过程中的功能语类表现,包括时态短语(TP)和标句词短语(CP)及次级焦点短语(FocusP)和限定短语(FiniteP)。结果显示:①患者TP障碍严重、恢复慢,尤易在“了1”上犯错;②呈现焦点量化障碍,“连”字句的极性敏感度受损严重但恢复较快。研究结果验证了跨语言的“过去时态障碍”,但不支持句法树高层受损假说。汉语失语症患者“了1”和“了2”的共性和分离性实证数据也显示汉语中的确存在隐性的限定与非限定的对立。The present study aimed to investigate the functional category defi cits,including the Tense Phrase(TP),the Complementizer Phrase(CP),and the subprojections FocusP and FiniteP,in a Chinese speaker with agrammatic aphasia during his recovery process.The results revealed that the patient had the greatest diffi culty with the TP,with a notable defi cit in referring to the past tense.His sensitivity to the polarity items was severely impaired but had steadily been recovered.Although the data from Chinese agrammatism evinced the cross-linguistic demonstration,our results did not support the Tree Pruning Hypothesis.This study provided evidence for the theoretical analysis of the verbal le1 and the sentence-final le2.This study also shed light on the distinctions between fi niteness and non-fi niteness in the Chinese language.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147